Ruth 4:5-6

 

Whenever we’re asked to make a commitment involving our time, effort, or resources, we usually ask (or at least think) “What’s in it for me?”

This question, whether we like it or not, whether we acknowledge it or not, is a kind of mantra that drives and directs most of the decisions that we make.

Think about this and discuss…
When was the last time you asked (or thought) “What’s in it for me?”

 

 

[Read Ruth 4:5-6]

 

 

As we looked at las time, the closer relative agrees to redeem Naomi’s land.
Why?
What are the benefits of this business deal?

 

What does the fact that Naomi has no sons mean for this ‘kinsman redeemer’ and this deal?

 

 

What else could redeeming Naomi’s land mean for this guy?

 

 

However, straight after part 1 of the deal, Boaz mentions part 2.
What do we read in verse 5 and how does this change things for this nearer relative?

 

 

If this ‘kinsman redeemer’ does chose to take this deal and take on these responsibilities, what are the implications?
What are the negatives or the ‘cons’ of agreeing to take on Ruth as well?

 

 

 

Additionally, how could what had already happened to Mahlon and Killion make this relative reluctant to take Boaz up on this offer?

 

 

What do we read in verse 6?
What’s happening here?

How would Boaz be feeling hearing this?

How might he react?

 

 

In the conclusion of this scene, at the ‘Town Gate’, what are the two positive outcomes?

 

 

 

 

 

Today, in your life, is God asking you to assume additional responsibilities (whether that’s in your family, church, or work)?