Skip to main content

Ruth 1:3-5

 There's a kind of modern parable that talks about how, if you want to boil a frog (and who doesn't?!) then you can't simply throw a live frog into a boiling pan... it would just jump straight back out. The trick is to place the frog into cold water and then heat it slowly, the frog doesn't notice the rise in temperature until it's too late...


[Read Ruth 1:3-5]


Not long after the move to Moab, Naomi becomes a widow.
Things have definitely not turned out the way they planned.
Can anyone relate?

Widowed, alone in a foreign country, she now has the difficult task of raising her two sons by herself.
The obvious and logical solution would have been to go straight back to Bethlehem... but she doesn't.
What could be the reason(s) for her to stay in Moab?

Instead of heading back to the 'bread' of home, she remains in the 'dirty washbasin' of Moab.
Back in verse 1, we see that the intention was to only ever be there "for a while" but how long is she actually there for?


[Activity] Read Deuteronomy 7:3-4 & Exodus 34:15-16.
What does God tell the Israelites in both of these readings?


By the end of Ruth 1:5 what else do we find out and why is this important?

Now, with all three men dead, Naomi finds herself completely alone and unable to provide for herself (let alone her two daughters-in-law!)
The family line of Elimelek is over.
Naomi is no considered "hopeless poor".
What are Naomi's options at this point in the story?


We don't know why the three males died.
Jewish tradition suggests that these deaths were punishment for their sins... Elimelek, for leaving the Promised Land in the first place, and Mahlon & Kilion for marrying Moabites.

If you were Naomi, would you allow your children to marry people of a different ethnicity and culture?
Would you stop them from marrying women of different religious affiliations?
Why or why not?


Whatever the reason, one thing is certain... this story begins with tragedy.
This family make a bad decision and exchanges one famine for three funerals.
And we end this scene with three widows.


In the New Testament, Paul talks about being all things for all people... what are the benefits and dangers of assimilating the values of the community we live in?

How can we make sure that we adopt the good and avoid the bad?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disciple: Judas

  {Disciples} JUDAS ISCARIOT_   Turning away     The most notorious of al the disciples – and the one universally scorned – is Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Jesus. His name appears in every list of the disciples (except in Acts 1), and it always appears last.   The other eleven are an encouragement to us because they show how common people can be used by God, even with all their faults and failures, to do remarkable things.   Judas, on the other hand, stands as a warning about the power of spiritual carelessness and pride, which can drag us away from loyalty to Christ.   Judas lived in close proximity to Jesus for three years.   He heard every teaching; he saw every miracle.   But in all that time his heart only grew harder.   The other disciples were being transformed, by Jesus, into passionate followers; Judas was being changed too...     [Group discussion starter] Have you ever had a friend or colleague that appeared to b...

Ephesians 5:21 - 6:9

  [Grace and Peace] EPHESIANS_   [Activity] Spend some time exploring the logical flow of Ephesians 5:21-6:9…   [Read Ephesians 5:21]   Paul addresses different relationship types (marriage, family, co-workers) when he writes to the Ephesians. Before he gets specific in his instructions, he gives a general one. What attitude are we supposed to have towards others?     What should submission look like in daily life?     [Read Ephesians 5:22-33]   In verses 22-24, why does Paul tell wives to submit to their husbands?     How does remembering that a wife is really submitting to the Lord affect submission to a husband?     In verses 25-33, how are husbands, in turn, to treat their wives?     How does comparing a husband’s love for his wife to how the Messiah loves the church remove any danger of the husband abusing the wife’s submission?       What ...

PARABLE: the rich man and Lazarus

  {PARABLE} the rich man and Lazarus_   Luke 16:19-31   Have you ever heard someone say that religion is just  a ‘crutch’ or just a source of comfort for the weak?   Have you ever heard someone say that religious people pay no attention to those who are hungry or suffering?   Christianity doesn’t teach passive suffering in the face of injustice and oppression. Jesus calls us to serve those who are in need.     [Discussion starter] Have you ever been asked for money by someone homeless?   How did you react?     The final parable in this study reminds us that suffering in this life can be replaced by bliss in the next ...     [Read Luke 16:19-31]     In verses 19-21, how does the parable reveal the rich man’s lack of concern for Lazarus?       How would you account for the rich man’s indifference towards Lazarus?       What are some of the ways that you have heard people explain why ...